Rental Revolution: Navigating the Landlord Fairness Code


As we moved into December, the city of Tacoma implemented the Landlord Fairness Code Initiative (LFCI), a groundbreaking set of renter protections that garnered significant attention during a contentious campaign and vote last month. However, what raised eyebrows among landlords and property management companies like ours, Spinnaker Property Management, was the absence of a designated enforcement mechanism for the LFCI.

When did the LFCI for Rentals Start?

The LFCI, which took effect on December 8, introduced several changes, including winter and school-year eviction bans, a $10 cap on late rental fees, and a requirement for landlords to provide tenant-relocation assistance if they increased rent by 5% or more. These changes were significant for both tenants and landlords in Tacoma.

Who is Overseeing the Implementation of Regulations?

One striking aspect of the LFCI was that the responsibility of enforcement did not fall on the city of Tacoma. Instead, tenants were required to take their landlords to court to contest any alleged violations. This unique approach raised concerns among property management professionals like us at Spinnaker, as we questioned who would oversee and ensure the fair implementation of these new regulations.

In a recent Q+A session, representatives from the city explained that they wouldn’t enforce the LFCI because the initiative lacked a specific enforcement mechanism that granted the city administrative authority. This decision left tenants with the task of pursuing legal action against landlords for any violations.

What are the Consequences for Landlords?

For landlords, the potential consequences were substantial. Violations of the LFCI could result in penalties ranging from $500 to five times the monthly rent per violation. This put a considerable burden on property owners to navigate the legal landscape carefully.

One of the primary concerns from our perspective was the potential legal challenges the LFCI might face. If contested in court, the city would be obligated to defend the initiative, adding another layer of complexity to the already intricate landscape of tenant-landlord relationships in Tacoma.

What Does Spinnaker Think about LFCI?

Spinnaker Property Management acknowledged the intentions behind the LFCI, as advocated by Tacoma for All, the organization that campaigned for Measure 1. The initiative aimed to empower tenants, especially those facing financial difficulties due to unfair rent hikes. However, the reliance on private rights of action raised questions about the accessibility and efficiency of justice in the court system.

While Ann Dorn, a representative from Tacoma for All, saw the direct path to court as a faster means of achieving justice, concerns lingered regarding the potential burden on tenants who might not be well-versed in legal matters. Additionally, the demand for pro bono legal services in Tacoma was already high, making it essential for City Hall and the City Council to proactively engage in public education about tenant rights under the LFCI.

As the LFCI came into effect, both landlords and tenants had to familiarize themselves with the changes, including alterations to rent increases, fees, and move-in costs. It was crucial for all parties involved to seek legal counsel and understand the implications of these new regulations.

The implementation of the LFCI in Tacoma raised valid concerns for property management professionals like Spinnaker. As we navigated these changes, we hoped for proactive measures from the city to educate the public and address potential challenges in the enforcement of this initiative. The coming months undoubtedly shed light on how the LFCI impacted the Tacoma rental landscape and whether the private rights of action approach proved effective in ensuring fairness for all parties involved.

If you are a landlord or tenant and have questions about LFCI or the rental market in the Tacoma area, give us a call.

Contact Us
close slider